The 12-12-22 edition of Cleveland's PD, "Letter to the Editor" stressed, "Businesses should not be forced to violate their beliefs." I look at it as a true form of logic that should be considered by all sides. My recent, similar letter to The Brunswick Post wasn't published, most likely for the sake of time and space. For your consideration, I herein re-submit the opening paragraph of said letter.
I just read an article wherein the Supreme Court is wrestling pros and cons of companies doing business with whom their beliefs don't agree. I'm not anti anyone who chooses a specific lifestyle. Allowing the court to decide, "Goose vs Gander," will not dissuade either standoff. Toss aside party stance, left/right, woke/not, cancel culture, your own lifestyle, etc. Those foundations contain at least one brick of, "Don't confuse me with fact. My mind is already made up!"
How about: "All-A-Y'all Catering," "A to Z Bakery," "No Negative Photography," amongst many. Today's world of social media providers and all other algorithms began with premises of improving communication, reducing time between manufacturing to consumers, controlling overhead, you name it. All were fantastic until greed entered the building. Technology designed to save time now controls most of it, current mantra being, "Profit Over People."
Addendum: Wacky begets more of the same. After considering prices, should the Rolls-Royce dealer be sued because I opted for the more economical Subaru?
Finally: In the previous century, There weren't countless suits filed protesting a specific sign seen at most retail establishment entryways, that being, "We Reserve the Right to Refuse Service to Anyone"
No comments:
Post a Comment